Executive Hire News Executive Hire News
Executive Hire News Executive Hire News Executive Hire News
Executive Hire News
Executive Hire News Home About Executive Hire News Executive Hire News Latest industry news Executive Hire News What's new Executive Hire News Events diary Executive Hire News EHN archives Executive Hire News Executive Hire Show Executive Hire News Advertise Executive Hire News Contact us
Executive Hire News

November/December 2016
Executive Hire News
Executive Hire News
Executive Hire News
View a digital copy of the
November/December EHN issue

Executive Hire News
Executive Report
Executive Hire News
Obituary
Executive news
Road Show News
Showman's saves energy
Bright outlook
Ready to Advance
Review security
Up to Standard
Seen at Saltex
Executive Hire News
Profile: Eagle Plant Hire
Executive Hire News
Eagle's leap of faith

Market Report: Site Welfare & Security Equipment
Executive Hire News
“More than a metal box”
Latest products

Market Report: Compact Plant
Executive Hire News
Valuing versatility
Clean sweep
Latest products

In the spirit of Crosshire
Executive Hire News
Morning calls

 

 

KEYWORD SEARCH
Executive Hire News
Executive Hire News
SEARCH

 

Executive Hire News

Executive Hire News › Archives › November/December 2016 › Executive Report : Review security

Executive Report : Review security

Always willing to share his knowledge, GAP MD, Iain Anderson, discusses practical measures to prevent equipment theft and fraudulent hire attempts.

At the recent Executive Hire Show Scotland, held in Glasgow, returning speaker, GAP MD Iain Anderson, provided an update on how machinery and equipment theft from hirers’ premises can be reduced. He said that theft in general remains a huge problem, with estimates that between £1.5m and £2m worth of items are stolen from UK sites every week. “It is worth remembering that it is not simply the value of the kit stolen that is important, but also the costly outage on our customers’ sites, the need for replacement hire, and the expense on hirers’ insurance.”

Thieves are becoming more sophisticated, often using modern technology to spy on hirers’ yards. Small digital cameras with antennae attached to lithium batteries can provide surveillance for several days, and relatively cheap drones could be flown several hundred metres away and record the layout of equipment and general yard activity. Indeed, figures from PANIU (Plant and Agricultural National Intelligence Unit) suggested that plant theft had increased approximately 25% in the first half of 2016.

Besides standard practices such as alarm systems, GAP adopts a range of measures to protect its depots. Palisade fencing can be installed on top of concrete walls to prevent machine movement in the event of a break-in, and concrete barriers are placed across gates. Alarmingly, in one past incident, thieves had gained access via an adjacent property that was not so well protected, and so it was worth checking with neighbours to ensure they take their security seriously.

GAP now has a three-part process for evaluating depot security. Primary measures reduce the possibility of break-ins, secondary approaches limit losses in the event of intruders, and a tertiary assessment is conducted to learn from an incident and identify additional steps to take. “During this inspection, we place ourselves in the shoes of the criminal, considering security externally as if trying to break in, rather than internally looking out. This might involve identifying vulnerable areas and installing alarms on perimeter fencing and CCTV, then considering how, if a thief did gain entry, we can prevent them moving machines, such as by disabling plant. We regularly review existing security.”

For primary protection, GAP’s alarm system providers are now contracted to include a six-monthly depot survey with managers, and personnel undertake monthly checks of site perimeters, layout changes, lighting and CCTV, with all machine keys and fobs being accounted for. Iain said it was also important to check that security systems were in working condition. Plant and equipment have corporate branding, which can be embossed on items with plastic casings, and machine are fitted with CESAR anti-theft protection from Datatag, or other deterrents. Secondary measures include removing and locking away machine keys at night, parking plant to prevent easy movement, blocking vehicle exits and fitting tracking devices. Ladders and climbing equipment are stored inside, and caged areas are incorporated inside workshops to store high-value equipment.

Iain stressed the need to be vigilant against fraudulent hire activity. Recent attempts GAP has experienced include someone posing as
a construction company, giving a head office phone number and address which proved bogus when checked. In another case, cold callers arrived at a depot attempting to pass themselves off as employees of a recognised company, complete with a form of identity which again proved false. Additional measures introduced by GAP have included being suspicious of unusual orders or unlikely combinations of equipment, querying deliveries to residential premises, checking car registration numbers, and making calls to a previously verified head office to check the legitimacy of orders.

Finally, Iain said that the Plant Hire Steering Group is working closely with a campaign group called Financial Fraud Action UK, the Combined Industry Theft Solutions (CITS) organisation and the Metropolitan Police to deliver a joint UK campaign, scheduled to be announced soon. •

     
Executive Hire News
 Site map
Executive Hire News
Privacy policy 
Executive Hire News
Executive Hire News
website designed & produced by Weblinks Advertising Limited
Executive Hire News
Executive Hire News Executive Hire News