
CROSSHIRE:
THATS
NEVER
HAPPENED
BEFORE!
Let
me
share
with
you
come
comments
that
have
been
offered
to
me
during
the
past
few
weeks
by
manufacturers
trying
to
defend
what
appears
to
be
a
growing
epidemic:
You
are
the
only
customer
to
report
such
a
problem,
Weve
sold
lots
of
them
and
yours
is
the
first
one
to
spew
oil
all
over
a
clients
(expensive)
flooring,
and
Thats
never
happened
before!
Many
of
our
suppliers
of
equipment,
from
power
tools
to
heavy
metal,
are
seemingly
skimping
on
their
final
quality
inspections
before
sending
new
products
to
market.
I
know
that
I
am
not
alone
in
finding
that
the
period
of
ownership
of
equipment
when
it
is
at
its
most
unreliable
is
rapidly
becoming
the
first
few
weeks
of
its
operational
life.
We
have
taken
delivery
of
brand
new
kit
that
has
had
axle
units
come
detached
within
hours
of
use.
In
addition,
we
have
had
many
different
products
that
at
best
weep
oil
and
at
worst
have
dumped
the
contents
of
their
hydraulic
system
over
our
clients
property.
Come
on
chaps,
hydraulic
components
are
light
years
ahead
of
what
they
were
20
years
ago
and
yet
you
still
cannot
fit
them
without
pinching
the
O
rings
or
cross
threading
the
pipes,
let
alone
failing
to
tighten
things
up
correctly!
We
also
had
a
machine
delivered
with
several
important
fastenings
loose,
while
another
had
its
safety
prop
missing.
In
many
of
these
instances,
our
first
contact
with
the
supplier
produced
verbal
garbage
similar
to
the
above
quotations.
In
all
cases,
once
the
supplier
had
been
convinced
that
we
were
serious
in
our
complaint,
it
was
rectified
without
charge.
This
is
all
very
well,
but
we
have
to
bear
the
consequential
problems
and
costs
associated
with
such
matters
when
they
occur
on
our
customers
jobs,
very
often
involving
the
cost
of
substituting
another
machine
whilst
the
offending
item
is
rectified.
No
doubt
the
clout
that
the
really
big
fleet
buyers
have
allows
them
to
recover
some
of
these
related
costs,
but
my
experience
is
that,
with
one
or
two
honourable
exceptions,
most
manufacturers
will
resist
such
claims
from
the
majority
of
their
customers.
The
general
attitude
prevailing
with
suppliers
seems
to
be
that,
as
they
will
put
faults
right
under
warranty,
it
is
okay
to
skimp
on
final
inspection
during
the
production
process.
Is
this
because
they
calculate
that
many
hire
companies
will
rectify
small
faults
themselves
without
too
much
moaning
in
the
rush
to
get
kit
out
on
hire?
Are
full
order
books
tempting
some
makers
to
put
quality
control
staff
on
other
production
duties?
In
effect,
our
industry
is
doing
much
of
the
final
quality
inspection
for
our
suppliers
because
they
know
that
most
of
us
will
not
hire
out
even
a
brand
new
item
without
first
thoroughly
inspecting
it.
I
have
no
doubt
that
the
offenders
can
produce
reams
of
paper
to
prove
that
they
do
what
the
Machinery
Directive
and
HSE
regulations
require
of
them.
Perhaps
it
would
be
better
to
do
less
work
with
the
pen
and
computer,
and
a
little
more
with
the
mark
one
eyeball
and
spanner!
With
more
and
more
of
our
inventory
being
made
in
places
that
were
once
only
known
because
of
their
inclusion
in
schoolboy
stamp
albums,
and
international
manufacturers
sourcing
the
same
component
from
more
than
one
subcontractor,
there
is
plenty
of
opportunity
for
problems
to
occur.
This
means
that
the
rationale
of
buying
new
and
offering
the
latest
technology
is
going
to
come
back
and
bite
us
if
the
first
few
hours
of
use
are
proving
traumatic.
The
makers
final
test
and
inspection
process
must
be
fit
for
purpose
so
that
our
industry
can
have
confidence
that
our
latest
purchases
will
not
prove
an
expensive
embarrassment.
Whilst
most
suppliers
have
full
order
books,
they
may
only
pay
lip
service
to
our
legitimate
needs
in
this
area,
but
I
sincerely
hope
that
those
of
you
who
have
suffered
unreasonable
problems
during
early
ownership
will
remind
your
supplier
that
what
goes
around,
comes
around.
Executive
Hire
News
Archives
September
2007
Crosshire
That's
Never
Happened
Before!
 |