
CROSSHIRE:
HOLD
OUT
FOR
THE
RIGHT
RATE
I
was
not
the
only
one
to
have
a
go
at
the
SED
organisers
for
the
traffic
fiasco
last
year,
so
I
will
congratulate
them
for
a
vast
improvement
this
time
round.
Paradoxically
I,
and
many
others
like
me,
set
off
early
and
then
found
myself
kicking
my
heels
waiting
at
the
entrance
until
9am.
Perhaps
SED
should
follow
The
Executive
Hire
Shows
example
and
open
at
8am,
as
ours
is
a
traditional
early
bird
industry.
With
the
volume
of
business
being
done,
I
am
sure
exhibitors
would
have
welcomed
an
earlier
start
at
least
on
the
first
two
days.
It
was
good
to
hear
from
many
exhibitors
that
they
were
taking
real
orders
and
genuine
enquiries.
However,
both
at
the
Show
and
while
networking
in
the
evenings,
there
was
one
subject
that
many
suppliers
were
keen
to
discuss,
and
variations
of
the
same
question
were
asked
of
many
hiremen.
Suppliers
were
exasperated
by
the
attitude
of
some
hirers
whom
they
consider
are
letting
the
whole
supply
chain
down.
They
argued
that,
with
equipment
light
years
better
in
quality
than
20
years
ago,
with
SED
confirming
that
demand
is
ahead
of
supply
for
many
manufacturers,
and
with
legislation
driving
customers
to
seek
increasingly
higher
standards,
why
are
the
net
hire
rates
levied
by
our
side
of
the
industry
so
pathetic?
In
many
cases
low
rates
are
accompanied
by
poor
service
because
(surprise,
surprise)
there
is
no
money
to
pay
for
decent
staff.
Before
anyone
points
a
finger,
I
can
say
that
I
have
seen
as
many
invoices
for
low
rates
from
independents
as
the
larger
groups.
A
big
chunk
of
our
industry
is
putting
out
machines
at
rates
that
defy
belief.
I
have
recently
seen
proof
of
13m
telehandlers
at
£150/week,
Genie
Z45
booms
at
£120/week,
and
weekly
hire
of
one-bag
mixers
for
a
fiver.
None
of
them
have
been
old
machines,
nor
have
the
jobs
been
of
unusually
long
duration.
As
one
prominent
supplier
put
it,
You
guys
are
nuts.
You
have
access
to
the
best
technology,
increasing
warranty
periods
and
many
of
you
demand
special
finance
deals
or
marketing
kickbacks,
all
of
which
are
available
across
the
industry
within
reason,
but
you
are
unwilling
to
ask
a
realistic
hire
rate.
This
is
not
unreasonable,
and
I
detect
just
a
hint
of
some
major
suppliers
starting
to
get
frustrated
by
our
industry.
The
alarm
bells
should
start
to
ring
when
I
reveal
that
at
this
SED,
I
saw
an
increasing
number
of
knowledgeable
staff
from
builders
and
contractors
looking
at
kit.
They
were
not
just
keeping
abreast
of
developments,
they
were
looking
to
purchase!
The
old
adage
suggests
everything
that
goes
around
comes
around,
and
although
it
is
unlikely
that
the
great
in-house
plant
empires
that
once
held
sway
in
some
places
will
ever
return,
there
is
strong
evidence
that
a
significant
number
of
users
are
looking
to
own
at
least
some
plant
once
more.
They
are
looking
to
suppliers
to
provide
technical
backup
from
qualified
staff,
as
they
are
fed
up
with
the
service
from
many
hirers.
Whether
you
hire
small
tools
or
large
plant,
can
you
really
say
that
you
are
anywhere
near
satisfied
with
your
rates?
If
you
got
only
10%
more,
would
you
employ
or
train
more
staff?
The
hire
boom
may
not
be
over
yet,
but
too
many
of
us
are
still
living
in
the
days
when
spark
plugs
were
five
bob
each
and
customers
were
grateful
if
we
put
them
on
a
waiting
list.
If
you
offer
good
kit
and
good
service,
now
is
the
time
to
say
enough
is
enough
and
hold
out
for
the
right
rate.
Failing
that,
our
only
salvation
might
be
when,
not
if,
those
nice
people
in
Brussels
decide
that
there
must
be
a
definitive
life
to
certain
classes
of
industrial
equipment
before
it
is
scrapped.
Now
that
would
sort
out
the
depreciation
gerrymanderers
from
the
rest
of
us.
Executive
Hire
News
Archives
June
2007
Crosshire
Hold
Out
For
The
Right
Rate
 |