
Market
Report:
Health
&
Safety
pt2:
Hand
arm
vibration,
noise
&
dust
Breathe
more
easily
Many
of
the
threats
posed
by
dust
are
invisible.
Nigel
Strickland
discusses
the
nature
of
the
risks
and
some
of
the
solutions
that
hirers
can
offer.
For
many
years
it
has
been
known
that
dust
generated
during
quarrying,
mining
and
construction
can
cause
respiratory
problems
for
workers.
In
the
UK
today,
awareness
of
the
need
for
dust
prevention
and
control
is
increasingly
evident,
with
government
air
quality
strategies
and
revised
Health
&
Safety
legislation
changing
attitudes
and
influencing
work
practices.
In
London
and
other
major
cities,
fine
particles
of
dust
under
10
microns
in
diameter
(referred
to
as
PM10)
generated
by
construction
and
other
activities
are
recognised
as
significant
pollutants.
They
could
travel
long
distances,
even
in
light
winds,
and
could
harm
the
health
of
the
local
population
as
well
as
site
workers.
The
UK
Air
Quality
Strategy
requires
local
authorities
to
work
towards
achieving
national
air
quality
objectives.
Accordingly,
construction
site
operators
are
increasingly
required
to
demonstrate
that
nuisance
dust
and
fine
particle
emissions
are
effectively
controlled
to
within
acceptable
limits.
In
addition,
changes
to
the
Control
of
Substances
Hazardous
to
Health
Regulations
1988
(CoSHH)
were
introduced
in
October
2006.
Research
suggested
that
the
previous
regulations
permitted
worker
exposure
to
respirable
crystalline
silica
(RCS)
levels
that
gave
rise
to
a
20%
risk
of
contracting
the
debilitating
illness,
silicosis.
There
are
140,000
construction
workers
who
are
exposed
to
RCS
on
a
regular
basis.
The
new
Working
Exposure
Limit
(WEL)
is
now
0.1
milligrams
of
RCS
per
cubic
metre
of
air,
averaged
over
an
eight-hour
period
(expressed
as
0.1
mg/m3).
This
is
almost
impossible
to
visualise,
but
a
sugar
cube
weighs
approximately
3.75g,
a
milligram
is
one
thousandth
of
a
gram
and
0.1mg
is
one
tenth
of
a
milligram!
So
the
new
WEL
allows
an
incredibly
small
amount
of
RCS
to
be
present.
Silica
dust
can
be
created
when
building
materials
such
as
bricks,
blocks,
tiles
and
natural
stone
are
subject
to
cutting,
drilling
and
grinding.The
visible
particles
are
not
the
most
harmful,
as
most
are
trapped
in
the
nose
and
throat
when
inhaled.
But
the
invisible
RCS
particles
are
inhaled
deep
into
the
lungs,
potentially
leading
to
serious
illnesses
such
as
silicosis
and
lung
cancer.
Effects
of
prolonged
exposure
can
be
latent
for
up
to
20
years,
by
which
time
the
results
are
irreversible
and
can
be
fatal.
RCS
can
also
cause
chronic
obstructive
pulmonary
disease
(COPD),
chronic
bronchitis
and
emphysema.
Controlling
exposure
In
complying
with
CoSHH,
employers
must
assess
the
risk
and
then
prevent
or
control
exposure
to
RCS
dust
to
the
WEL
or
less.
This
should
be
achieved
by
measures
other
than
respiratory
protective
equipment,
(RPE)
as
far
as
is
reasonably
practicable.
One
of
the
most
effective
methods
of
reducing
RCS
is
through
the
control,
or
capture,
of
dust
at
source
through
suppression
or
extraction.
Water
suppression
is
a
tried
and
tested
method,
either
by
using
a
pressurised
water
container,
or
by
a
hose
connected
to
mains
water
supply
or
a
water
tank.
Both
methods
are
particularly
suitable
when
used
with
petrol
cut-off
saws
and
studies
suggest
a
minimum
water
flow
rate
of
about
0.5
litres/minute
optimises
dust
suppression.
Obviously,
this
mode
of
control
is
not
compatible
with
most
electric
power
tools,
although
specialised
products
are
appearing.
Effective
disposal
of
the
residual
dust
slurry
also
needs
to
be
considered.
If
it
is
left
to
dry
it
can
be
disturbed
by
later
site
activity
and
become
potentially
hazardous.
One
solution
is
to
use
wet
suction
vacuums.
Capturing
dust
at
source,
using
mobile
dust
extraction
systems
(local
exhaust
ventilation,
or
LEV)
has
been
common
in
Europe
for
many
years
and
is
now
gaining
in
popularity
in
the
UK.
These
systems,
which
represent
an
obvious
hire
opportunity,
are
much
more
than
high-powered
vacuum
cleaners
and
the
basic
technology
needs
to
be
understood
by
users
and
hirers
alike.
A
European
standard
EN60335
classifies
LEV
systems
as
L,
M
or
H
(low,
medium
or
high
extraction)
and
it
is
vitally
important
to
recognise
that
the
size
and
capacity
of
the
system
must
match
the
task
in
hand.
Most
industrial
systems
offer
three-stage
filtration
to
provide
the
performance
necessary
to
meet
the
RCS
exposure
limits.
The
first
element
of
a
good
dust
extractor
will
usually
include
cyclonic
action,
which
ensures
the
largest,
heaviest
particles
of
dust
and
debris
are
spun
out
to
the
sides
of
the
collector
to
then
fall
into
the
collecting
bag
through
the
effect
of
gravity,
without
ever
coming
into
contact
with
the
filtration
system.
Air
containing
finer
particles
is
then
cleansed
by
a
pre-filter,
whose
surface
area
will
indicate
its
efficiency:
the
larger
the
area,
the
more
effective
it
will
be.
Some
manufacturers
offer
pre-filters
in
a
washable,
polyester
format
as
well
as
of
cellulose
paper
design,
which
can
be
an
important
cost
consideration
for
hirers.
The
key
component
of
any
LEV
dust
extraction
system
will
be
the
final
element
of
its
filtration
system,
known
as
HEPA
(high
efficiency
particulate
air
filtration).
The
best
can
remove
as
much
as
99.995%
of
airborne
particles,
including
particles
0.3mg
in
diameter,
which
are
the
most
harmful.
The
filters
consist
of
a
mat
of
randomly
arranged
fibres.
It
is
commonly
assumed
that
it
acts
like
a
sieve,
whereby
particles
smaller
than
the
largest
opening
can
pass
through,
but
this
is
quite
wrong.
HEPA
filters
target
much
smaller
pollutants
and
particles,
trapping
them
by
interception,
impaction
or
diffusion.
Because
of
the
extra
density
of
the
filter,
the
vacuum
cleaner's
motor
needs
to
be
more
powerful
to
overcome
the
increased
air
resistance
while
still
providing
adequate
cleaning
power.
These
three
elements
combine
to
create
the
most
effective
method
of
ensuring
that
air
exiting
the
vacuum
meets
the
exposure
limits.
Most
dust
extraction
systems
also
enhance
worker
safety
by
having
a
system
of
cleaning
the
pre-filter
and
emptying
the
collection
bag,
without
exposing
the
operative
to
dust
and
ensuring
the
safe
disposal
of
the
contents.
Capturing
dust
at
source
The
efficiency
of
dust
extraction
systems
can
be
further
enhanced
by
fitting
suction
casings
to
tools
such
as
grinders,
saws
and
drills
to
ensure
the
maximum
amount
of
dust
is
captured
at
source.
A
large
range
of
casings
to
fit
most
leading
tools
are
available,
and
many
equipment
manufacturers
now
make
products
with
a
dust
outlet
fitted
as
standard.
An
additional
method
of
controlling
dust
is
by
using
mobile
air
cleaners
which
can
be
placed
within
an
enclosed
or
screened
work
zone
and
continuously
recycle
air
through
a
HEPA
filtration
system.
These
are
particularly
appropriate
for
refurbishment
work
in
houses,
schools,
hospitals
and
offices,
particularly
where
occupants
are
still
resident.
Finally,
it
is
worth
noting
that
it
is
not
just
our
customers
who
are
at
risk
from
dust.
Consideration
needs
to
be
given
to
hire
industry
technicians
and
mechanics,
who
daily
repair
and
clean
machinery
returned
from
hire.
It
is
inevitable
that
exposure
to
dust
will
occur,
with
minimal
knowledge
of
the
type,
and
the
level,
of
dust.
In
the
Nordic
countries,
where
awareness
of
RCS
issues
has
been
evident
for
many
years,
hirers
like
Cramo
have
cleaning
cabinets
installed
as
a
standard
feature
in
their
hire
depot
workshops.
Tools
and
equipment
are
loaded
on
roller
conveyors,
through
the
end
covers
of
the
cabinet,
which
is
connected
to
a
central
dust
extraction
vacuum.
The
technician
can
put
his
hands
into
the
airtight
cabinet
and
use
an
integral
compressed
air
gun
to
clean
the
tool.
With
awareness
of
the
health
issues
of
dust
rapidly
increasing,
it
cannot
be
long
before
we
see
this
type
of
solution
commonplace
in
the
UK.
Executive
Hire
News
Archives
April
2007
Market
Report
Breathe
more
easily
 |