
CROSSHIRE:
NOT
ANOTHER
LEVY!
I
am
doubtless
not
the
only
one
accused
of
penny
pinching
when
I
remind
staff
not
to
waste
money.
Avoiding
leaving
electrical
appliances
running
unnecessarily
or
ordering
that
extra
spare
part
just
in
case
are
instances
familiar
to
most
hiremen.
In
fairness,
most
employees
co-operate,
so
when
I
hear
of
anything
that
has
the
potential
to
squander
money
without
us
having
any
choice
in
the
matter,
I
get
irritated.
I
refer
to
proposed
Business
Development
Initiatives
that
appear
to
be
coming
to
many
urban
areas.
Our
local
Chamber
of
Commerce
sought
my
views
on
a
scheme
it
is
running
on
behalf
of
our
local
authority.
It
seems
our
city
is
being
divided
into
areas
containing
large
concentrations
of
businesses,
and
each
will
be
asked
to
comment
on
how
the
infrastructure,
parking,
traffic
management
and
other
aspects
can
be
improved.
So
far
so
good
-
but
the
devil
is
in
the
detail.
The
cheeky
sods
say
that
a
levy
will
be
imposed
on
each
business
to
pay
for
this
wheeze
and
that,
once
implemented,
it
will
be
mandatory
for
each
business
to
pay
up!
After
coming
down
off
the
ceiling
I
asked
the
young
lady
who
visited
us
to
confirm
this.
She
replied
in
the
affirmative:
if
such
a
scheme
were
set
up
in
our
area,
we
would
be
required,
by
law,
to
pay.
So
what
do
we
pay
inflated
business
rates
for?
I
derive
little
tangible
benefit
from
the
four-figure
sum
I
already
pay
each
month
to
the
town
hall.
But,
countered
the
lady,
you
will
be
able
to
influence
the
benefits
to
your
area.
I
pointed
out
that
I
had
long
given
up
trying
to
get
our
council
to
undertake
sensible
improvements
in
our
street
as
it
invariably
had
loftier
priorities.
Besides,
in
an
area
of
mixed
commerce
and
industry,
just
who
would
get
the
greatest
priority?
More
brownie
points
are
gained
in
putting
flower
baskets
in
retail
areas
than
by
quickly
ejecting
itinerants
from
a
factory
car
park.
The
last
time
I
met
a
councillor
he
proudly
explained
how
the
council
had
reduced
social
exclusion
by
over
50%;
when
I
suggested
that
most
of
the
socially
excluded
were
on
night
shift
sawing
through
our
security
fence
he
did
not
seem
amused.
We
have
no
choice
but
to
swallow
excessive
cost
increases
brought
about
by
statutory
charges,
fuel
charges
and
the
like.
Now
it
seems
another
stealth
tax
could
be
in
the
pipeline.
If,
as
it
appears,
Chambers
of
Commerce
are
managing
this
new
initiative,
I
suggest
the
first
line
of
resistance
would
be
for
businesses
simply
to
resign
membership
of
their
local
chamber.
STAFF
MOVEMENTS
I
have
to
inform
readers
that
our
trusty
fitter
and
general
dogsbody,
Young
Arnold,
has
left
us
for
pastures
new.
He
had
not
planned
to
leave
but
he
had
his
wicked
way
with
a
young
lady
and
events
have
entered
a
nine-month
timescale
and
overtaken
him
somewhat.
He
has
moved
over
100
miles
away
from
us
and
his
suggestion
that
I
could
open
a
depot
near
his
new
abode
in
order
to
retain
his
services
fell
on
deaf
ears.
The
good
news
is
that
he
has
not
left
our
industry
but
has
taken
a
job
with
one
of
the
larger
organisations
in
the
hire
game.
He
has
been
on
the
phone
regularly,
giving
me
bits
of
gossip
about
his
new
employer,
so
we
can
all
look
forward
to
the
odd
despatch
from
him
in
the
future.
In
the
meantime,
I
am
recruiting,
and
judging
from
some
of
the
applicants
that
have
shuffled
up
to
my
office
so
far,
this
is
going
to
be
interesting!
Watch
this
space.
Executive
Hire
News
Archives
October
2006
Crosshire
Not
another
levy!
 |